More and more young people from wealthy nations are doing unpaid work in poorer nations. What are the reasons and who benefits more from this: the communities or young people?
An increasing number of youngsters from developed countries are taking part in voluntary work to help people in underpriviledged areas overseas. There are several reasons for this trend and I personally believe young people’s charitable work is beneficial to both the recipients and themselves.
The trend of participating in unpaid work for a short time in less developed nations results from young generations’ sense of global citizenship and need to explore themselves. Firstly, globalization has been having significant effects on people’s perception of the world, especially young people’s in developed countries, where they are taught about the importance of a united world and understanding of other cultures. Thus, they desire to go to places, get to know people in new lands and involve themselves in improving those communities. As a citizen of the globe, they want to make contributions to the development of poorer nations. Besides, such voluntary work gives young people opportunities to understand more about their own capabilities and passion so that they can make wiser choices of major of studies or future career. For example, some youngsters can learn that they prefer educational professions or some may discover their interest in construction.
In my opinion, young people’s engagement in unpaid work in developing countries brings advantages to both the communities and themselves. Obviously, the communities where young people offer voluntary work will enjoy their visible contributions such as the construction of bridges, schools and the completion of training courses. Also, the presence of young volunteers who are full of positive energy will inspire the member of the communities with hopes and expectations of better future. Meanwhile, taking short trips to do charitable services provides volunteers with knowledge and social skills that they would not otherwise learn in the academic environment, putting them at an advantage when applying for college courses or jobs in the future.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, volunteering to work in less developed countries has become a trend among youth in affluent nations, which, I believe, equally benefits the communities and volunteers.
- More and more young people from wealthy nations are doing unpaid work in poorer nations. What are the reasons and who benefits more from this: the communities or young people? 84
- International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited.Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r of youngsters from developed countries are taking part in voluntary work to hel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67058823529 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25815983898 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.238536069 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.307692308 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321727560437 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105089526182 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583561964102 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177371391831 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045966491717 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.