More companies have opened working areas without walls or barriers on their desks. Do the disadvantages of open-plan offices outweigh the advantages?
Open-plan offices with desks free from walls or barriers have become all the rage in more companies. This essay will examine both the benefits and drawbacks of this trend to give my verdict that the benefits of this phenomenon outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, open office concepts would have pernicious effects on employees’ privacy. This is derived from the fact that workers may be subjected to unwanted scrutiny from others with just a glance if there are no walls or barriers. Consequently, they might then experience a sense of disrespect for the lack of private workplaces, which can adversely affect their work proficiency. However, open working areas assist colleagues with more opportunities to communicate and cooperate, thus accumulating interpersonal skills such as communication and teamwork skills.
On the other hand, I believe that in terms of creating friendly working environments and curtailing the budget, the merits of open-plan offices outweigh the demerits. Initially, the open-plan design can act as a deterrent to stress and contribute to productivity as it would provide workers with a sense of relaxation and friendliness. Besides, another perk of open office concepts is saving money on setup costs. For example, barriers, which is made from metal and plastic, are often sold at a relatively high price. Therefore, companies that do not purchase these products would lessen the money splurged on office infrastructure.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that the advantages of cooperative and friendly working environments and saving costs outweigh the minimal disadvantages of lacking privacy in open-plan offices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-16 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | dinhphuonglinh | 55 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | lennie.butera | 61 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In most parts of the world the volume of traffic is growing at an alarming rate In the form of an assignment discuss the main traffic problems in your country their causes and possible solutions 89
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56370656371 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12959550148 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3054341327 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.083333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395087853132 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125816830108 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972588318066 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214133867427 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133107500786 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.