The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suberbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that relocating people from outside of the urban area or countryside to the cities is an impressive idea, aimed at managing traffic and vehicle problems. However, I completely disagree with this statement, because moving towards city increases congestion and demand for means of transportation exceed drastically.
Firstly, migration of suberbean people make cities overcrowded by rising numbers of residents. This leads to busier roads, as every individual uses either public or private vehicles, and people often get stuck in the traffic jam. As a result, they are not able to reach on time to committed places. In addition, there is possibility to get fired from their job as they are often more likely to be late . Kathmandu city is the prime example, where residents often face the problem of getting delayed for work due to massive jam.
Secondly, a demand for transportation would be higher than the availability. Public transportation is economical and people prefer using it, so, the local transport needs to become more accessible. Also, the number of private vehicle users rises, as people must commute from one place to another for work, study and other essential purposes. For instance, the proportion of school children and college students would multiply and as a result, the amount of school and college buses would have to be increased. Hence, it arouses as a problem rather than being a solution.
In conclusion, although traffic congest and transportation issues are growing, they can not be resolved by motivating people to live in cities. It might even cause more terrible problems such as overpopulation and overflow of private vehicles as well as public transport.
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suberbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention While others believe that it is the responsibility of the individual to protect themselves Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suberbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do yu agree or disagree It 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e cities is an impressive idea, aimed at managing traffic and vehicle problems. H...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as they are often more likely to be late . Kathmandu city is the prime example, wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25182481752 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87283313959 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620437956204 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2482682416 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213641256167 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692579376768 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479261899525 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133831989343 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459700623778 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.