Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree?
It is often argued that even though more than half of the working population consists of females in many developed nations, males hold top-level positions in many organizations. Hence, companies should assign a certain proportion of these positions to females. This essay disagrees with the statement as selection at executive level post should be merit-based and companies may hire unsuitable candidates for the job if the selection criteria are gender based.
Positions in companies, which are well paid and have a high status, should be given to the candidates having higher educational qualification and experience. Because these positions require candidates to have professional as well as social skills, in order to create a supportive working environment for the workers, which ultimately enhance productivity and profits for an organization. If these qualities are possessed by a man or woman, then that suitable candidate should be selected for the given post. For example, the post of Field Manager at the Tata motor units is selected on the basis of educational qualification and diplomatic communication skills.
While compelling companies to employ a female candidate for top-ranking position may result in hiring of a candidate not compatible for the job. This means that if companies allocate a fixed proportion of jobs to females, in the absence of suitable candidates, they have to hire females with less educational qualification and field experience. This spoils the working atmosphere and creates a negative impact on the fellow workers. For instance, in a well known reputed hospital at Pune, the CEO post was given to a woman for being a close relative of one of the board member in the absence of a potential candidate, and this led to immediate resignation of 15 doctors from the hospital.
In conclusion, selection at high level positions in companies should not be based on gender but should be on merit basis, and if companies allocate some of these positions to women they may choose the incompatible workers to do the job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-07 | AlMightylord86 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-21 | chhninder | 98 | view |
| 2017-01-11 | mabick_1527 | 83 | view |
| 2015-06-22 | youcandoit | 68 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards what are the advantages and advantages 84
- Most high level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women To what extent do you 73
- In some countries younger people are neglecting their rights to vote What problems does this cause and what are some of the possible solutions 73
- Scientists have been warning for many years about importance of protecting the environment and that we mustlimit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings many people do not do this. What are the reasons andhow people can be encouraged to tak 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and diplomatic communication skills. While compelling companies to employ a f...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nation of 15 doctors from the hospital. In conclusion, selection at high level p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the incompatible workers to do the job.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25151515152 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03543353564 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521212121212 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1296668504 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.416666667 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274296149148 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112762661494 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10227045733 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2087273174 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114279145704 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.