The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To many people, humanitarian improvements are the ultimate purpose that intellectual advances serve. From my perspective, I totally agree with this statement since only by assisting humans does the advent of science prove its worth.
Protesters might assume that the happiness and curiosity from pursuing truths are more significant than other rewards. However, until scientific discoveries could be applied to ordinary lives, these advances would not get adequate investments and attention. For instance, before the theory of Charle Darwin helped researchers explain the origin of human beings, biologist Charle Darwin himself was nearly the only one who study it with limited experiments on Holand beans. Moreover, several applications which could solve worrying problems might be missed if scientists only consider them as scientific concerns. A telling example of this is Nicole Tesla - a genius inventor with hundreds of potential inventions. Unfortunately, since Tesla did not intend to commercialize or publish them, many of his works were lost.
Moreover, prioritizing practical purposes over scientific concerns would facilitate the development of various scientific fields. For example, human developments are the cause of the advent of IT and AI technologies, not human curiosity. Specifically, Microsoft software was created to make office works less demanding, Siri virtual assistant was designed to help iPhone users with simple tasks and numerous apps on CH plays are being launched every month to serve any needs of humans. Finally, even though a discovery is considered a breakthrough in terms of science, if it causes harm to humans, it could be abandoned by governments and underrated by the public. Therefore, if any scientist wants his or her work to be appreciated, the work itself has to have some practical applications.
In conclusion, although studying science might serve several needs, scientific advances should aim to improve people’s quality of living first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-27 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university Do the advantaged of having a gap year outweigh its disadvantages 89
- Schools are teaching foreign languages to primary students Do the pros outweigh the cons 89
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6511627907 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00069616062 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687707641196 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1552645174 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110213346459 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356676677916 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585721501567 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094494023095 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830812483839 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.