The graph below shows consumers’ average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates the average spending per year on mobile phone, domestic and global fixed-line and services in US from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, it is visible that the category of international fixed-line mostly ranked the lowest and remained unchanged. Additionally, while the groups of cell phones services have tedency to increase the opposite was true for national fixed-line services.
Initially, the biggest money was spent on national fixed-line services which was $700 but only around $200 was for the two remaining. For cell phone services, there was a noticeable increase to $500, incomparison with a fall to $500 on national fixed-line services. At the same time, the figure for international fixed-line services fluctuated slightly over $300.
From the year 2006 onwards, the amount of average expenses in the category of cell phone services still grew from $500 to over $700 and become the most popular item with US’s residents. By contrast, the average yearly expenditure went up to $400 in the final year. During 4 years, a stability was witnessed in the figure for international fixed-line services.
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA 84
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22905027933 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92448362545 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.847761874 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31318932291 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150372913405 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697383564535 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225362412654 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598828654652 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.