Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agree that this is benefit.
To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, as the technology developing fast, internet, global trading and some other things bring more people in a globalised world. Happily, most people can accept this situation, but whether this situation good or not is still unknow. In addition, as I think, there are much more benefits on the development of globalisation.
As to the benefits, there are lots of things can be discussed. The one of the most important things in my opinion is that globalisation can be good for the cooperation and communication of differents countries. Because of globalisation, the global trading is more and more common in the world, and it is easy for us to buy different things from various countries in most supermarkets. And also, globalisation makes traveling to other countries convenient, so greater amount of people can travel to foreign areas. Secondly, I think a win-win condition can be brought by globalisation. As we all know, different countries have different superiorities, just like people, so globalisation can make countries strongpoints together and develop more quickly than working itself. Just as China, we can clearly see that benefit. Before Chinese economic reform, we did not want to consociate with the world, so we developed slowly and were occupied by other countries. But now, in the background of globalisation, we earn an excellent evolution. I the these are all the benefits which globalisation can take to us.
Though there are many benefits, it still has some negetive developments. Because of the globalisation, the relationship between different countries is extremely close. If one country suffers a severe risk, others might also be influenced. But this is the thing we must face because of globalisation, and we can not ignore the good things that globalisation brings to us.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different citid s between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agree that this is benefit.To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development? 40
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of eletricity used according to the number of occupants Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, still, as to, i think, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25517241379 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21519874544 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1480822968 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6470588235 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231020016026 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780595855182 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584040128447 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177942691745 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715549406932 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.