The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph shows the change of water used in three different sectors from 1900 to 2000, and the table illustrates water consumption in Brazil and Congo.
According to the line chart, great changes have taken place in agriculture, which the water used rose dramatically from around 500 Km³ in 1900 to 3000 Km³. Also over the period from 1900 to 2000, there were slightly increases both in industrial use and domestic use(from around 0 to 1000 Km³and 0 to around 500 Km³ respectively.)
From the table, it is apparent from the table that the number of population, irrigated land and water consumption per person in Brazil were all more than that in Congo. Brazil, with 176 million people, had 26500 km³ irrigated land and water consumption per person was 359 m³. While in Congo, water consumption was only 8 m³, though the population of Congo was 5.2 million and the area of irrigated land was 100 km³.
In conclusion, all the water use had an increase, what’s more the agriculture use was still the most important sector of global water use. In addition, water consumption in Brazil was obviously more than that in Congo.
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agree that this is benefit.To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development? 32
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agree that this is benefit.To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development? 40
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of eletricity used according to the number of occupants Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 69
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different citid s between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rom around 500 Km³ in 1900 to 3000 Km³. Also over the period from 1900 to 2000, ther...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88205128205 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57401162229 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9371737978 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259759167231 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140595906922 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898612014425 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196344537878 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101769651562 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.