Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced. They only care about how much it costs.
How true is this statement? What influences people when they buy food?
In contemporary society, it is generally believed that people are only attracted to the price of food rather than how it has been made. Personally, I totally agree with this statement. In addition, the following paper will be examining influencing consumers’ buying decisions when it comes to purchasing food.
For a variety of reasons, a great number of people, particularly those who have eight-hour jobs, prefer to choose cheap food without any notions of how they have been produced. Because of the hectic schedule at work, most employees would choose frozen or pre-cooked food in supermarkets or convenient stores as these products are ready for instant purchase. Another noteworthy reason is financial condition. In many countries, loads of families have low to medium income and thus, it is impossible for them to buy medium to high-pricing products. As a result, these people’s behaviours are shifted as they would go for cheap products or special promotion from the store.
Apart from the above mentioned practical concerns, there are several factors in addition to pricing that would highly impact customers’ buying decision. Nowadays, as the world has become a global village, people choose to follow a religion as an act to support their mental life. Consequently, it is compulsory to avoid consuming certain specific types of food, such as different kinds of animals. Futhermore there a small number of people who vary their food preference due to health condition. Particularly, some people might seriously consider the food ingredients as cosuming certain types of spices or raw materials will lead to alergy or even mortality. For instance, some individuals are incapable of absorbing MSG or gluten. Hence, when these people shop for food, they have to avoid products that contain these sorts of substances.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that people only pay more attention to price tag rather than other aspects when buying food. Moreover, religion and health are the other two factors that greatly impact food buying decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | xxlusubuxx | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | nguyen thanh sang | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-25 | cheetah__123 | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | khoapham | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | nhattram39 | 61 | view |
- In the future it is expected that the proportion of older people will be higher than that of young people in many developed countries What are the positive or negative effects of this development 78
- People should look after their health as a duty for a society rather than for personal benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It should be more expensive to make sugary products less appealing to consumers in order to encourage them to consume less Many manufactured foods and drinks contain high levels of sugar which can cause many health problems Do you agree or disagree 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits What are the problems of being famous Do you think being famous is good or bad 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...rent kinds of animals. Futhermore there a small number of people who vary their food preference d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37272727273 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84817696595 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.902415399 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.294117647 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322912844537 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899566107936 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655508975953 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199497121358 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547014545368 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.