Most people try to balance between work and other parts of lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this delicate balance. What are the main problems we are facing? What are the ways to overcome them?"
These days, due to the unprecedented growth of economy and lifestyle changes, maintaining work-life balance becomes a profoundly concerned issue whose the most serious influences on communities is destruction of people’s mental health. There are a number of measure should be implemented to address such problem.
It appears completely reasonable to believe that aforementioned problem can have devastating impacts on the state of health of people’s mind. In fact, economic burden and heavy workloads avert people from relieving stress and spending time with their families, therefore, they may have poor family bonding and at risk of having distress. Even worse, when parents can not succeed in balancing between work and other parts, their children can be affected especially teenager. Compared to those who have mothers and fathers sacrifice work time to rear them and understand their confusion, adolescents whose parents are workaholics are usually more vulnerable and able to have psychological disorders such as depression.
However, there are ample solutions that can be taken into consideration. First and foremost, individuals should have their own plans. It can not be denied that an outstanding schedule enables people get rid of distraction and focus on their duties. As a result, they can finish tasks faster and economize on their time budget. In addition, the state should enact strict regulations on businesses asking their employees work overtime. Once staffs do not have to take responsible numerous workloads, they can boost their positive energy as well as motivation to do other things.
In summary, the effect on emotional well-being become the primary demerit of failing in balance between work and other parts of lives, thus people should make attempt to deal with this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...ce becomes a profoundly concerned issue whose the most serious influences on communit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke attempt to deal with this problem.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in fact, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48214285714 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84554565981 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8367601882 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.076923077 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146291944927 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508840671727 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593826080157 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112753351593 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665938163353 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.