The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.

The maps illustrate the changes of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present
It is clear that, the village maps have major changes with a significant surge in the number of houses, shops and the striking transformation of farmland and forest park into sports field. These remarkable developments of the village are growing in a positive way over time to meet the living needs of the people.
Looking at the 1995 map, there were a large farmland and a forest park located in the north-east of the village. However, they were demolished to give way for golf course and tennis course at the moment. In the South of the village, we can see a hotel and a cafe have stayed unchanged since 1995 and the carpark is open to the right of the hotel.
Moreover, the modification of housing is also a considerable point when talking about the Ryemouth over this period. In the North, the houses were constructed with more 4 houses than be and the road was expanded to meet the increasing demand. To the South of the village there was a fishing port but have been removed up to the present time.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-24 hagiang123. 78 view
2023-07-10 Sella 78 view
2023-07-10 Sella 61 view
2023-07-02 TLan168 84 view
2023-07-02 TLan168 81 view
Essays by user Giang Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...developments of the village are growing in a positive way over time to meet the living needs of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58673469388 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51788169663 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3116009707 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0747007478493 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259867313868 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040372852038 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577201616676 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425036781334 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.