Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that museums and art galleries should only exhibit cultural and historical works of their own country instead of works of other nations in the world. In my opinion, I partly agree with this idea.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why the museums should display national masterpieces which show the specific cultural values of each country. Firstly, not only do literature works and artworks signify long-lasting history, but they also contain valuable lessons of ethnicities of each nation. Therefore, through the exhibitions of museums and art galleries, these works can instill moral values into young people and develop their patriotism. Secondly, tourism in countries can be advertised worldwide via the exhibiting pictures of cultures. As a result, the economy as well as communities can be improved and ameliorated. For instance, in Vietnam, many national museums are established and constructed in order to show the cultural quintessence.
On the other hand, there are some arguments which explain reasons why works of other countries are nominated and learned in the curriculum. This can be explained by obvious benefits. First of all, works of other nations can help people enhance horizon about world as well as other cultures. For example, literature works written by foreign authors are compulsory in the curriculum of Vietnam. In addition, there are conferences held so as to introduce works of other countries.
In conclusion, I believe that museums and art galleries should put more of an emphasis on works of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world.
- Task 2: Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- With the increasing use and development of new technology many machines are now able to do work which people used to perform What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 90
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- Task 2 Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 47
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library s membership in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...In addition, there are conferences held so as to introduce works of other countries. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... works of the other parts in the world.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78249760097 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6492916271 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428168539352 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139371963393 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145749875788 0.0667982634062 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327607474885 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146024951634 0.056905535591 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.