Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education.
In recent years, there is a contradictory view among the people, who are behaviorally modern Homosapiens, in the current education system. Some claim that the countries should prioritize vocational training over higher education, however, in my point of view, though there are compelling economic reasons to support this idea, the university’s program holds greater value.
To commence with, those who advocate that professional courses are significantly important may point out the financial benefits. This is because of the fact that such courses are much cheaper and faster in order to accomplish much more in less time frame. Moreover, it is useful to ease students into steady employment immediately. For instance, positions like hairdresser, hotel managers, and skilled technicians, who have established in such job instead of university programs, do not have to deal with incumbent debts. In contrast, if individual has been studying in the university, the pressure associated with university life should be struggled with. As a result, each person can complete such skill training and set aside much more money to run his own business.
Nevertheless, young talents are supposed to be provided by university courses in order to fulfill individuals and improve society’s abilities. The significance lies in the fact that can be found when a community who owns such engineers to be secure in a competitive age, when most countries tend to show off it is power to other ones. Consequently, this program might open up a window opportunity to explore a variety of fields fitted by the individual’s interests and assist the state to grow at steep paths in the world market. Furthermore, it is important to be more successful compared with others such as the UK who has been acted as a global leader due to forefront technology and highly talented manpower.
To sum up, despite the prominence of skill training positions in terms of reduction in expenditure that have to be dealt with by each person, governments ought to support higher education yet evet in dark economic times in order to reap future rewards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | chile | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Trang Hạnh | 80 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Men do most of the high level jobs Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women What is your opinion on that 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 73
- The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind However it has made little difference in most people s lives 84
- Some think that it is more important for children to engage in outdoor activities instead of playing videogames 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...int out the financial benefits. This is because of the fact that such courses are much cheaper and faste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for instance, in contrast, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21994134897 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00880337043 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615835777126 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6421542656 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.923076923 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150747738229 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048259573689 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451861345566 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888666183 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418343451461 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.