Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than university education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that governments should invest more in vocational education and the acquisition of practical work experience than in theoretical tertiary education. While practical expertise is important for certain fields, the role of university education in certain professional areas should not be overlooked.
On the one hand, it is universally agreed that one is required no formal education to succeed in the business world. This is because business skills can only be nurtured through actually working in this field, and the time spent trying to learn such skills as entrepreneurship or management through textbooks would mostly be a waste of time. A hands-on approach is what is needed to master the full package of competencies that business people need, and therefore this method of learning should always be favored over theoretical training in the field of business. To illustrate, Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard Business School to start his software venture which made him one of the most accomplished business magnets in the world today. If college education played any role in forming successful businessmen, Bill Gates would be a total failure.
On the other hand, there are other fields in which formal education is essential. Medicine, for example, relies heavily on research which is impossible to carry out without rounded theoretical knowledge specific to the field. In contrast with business, learning medicine through on-the-job training would result in catastrophic consequences because there is no such thing as trial and error when it comes to human lives. Engineering is another area of work in which university-level training is highly required. Engineering bridges, for example, takes a deep understanding of physics and applied mathematics because the whole process of such construction needs to be based on sound calculations and laws of physics. Otherwise, the bridge could collapse under pressure and claim lives.
In conclusion, both vocational and academic education should be attached equal importance as both can be highly essential in different professional fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-13 | ESSEYWRITER | 84 | view |
- Manufacturing instant noodles 78
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 84
- The graph below gives information about the number of jobs in four sectors of the economy in the US between 1960 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The only way to improve safety in our roads is to give stricter punishments to driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...cal knowledge specific to the field. In contrast with business, learning medicine throug...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 785, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...collapse under pressure and claim lives. In conclusion, both vocational and acade...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51384615385 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03977576252 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0571271282 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.846153846 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197879267934 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728601850538 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650350763463 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131117342837 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817221525967 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.