The news is an important source of knowledge for all of us about the world, especially in this era of technology. Journalists are mainly responsible to bring this news to us but not all of them are true to their responsibilities and ethics. How much can we trust the journalists? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge
In digitalization era, news is an essential source to broaden horizons about global information, and journalists have responsibility to distribute it without any trust issues based on reporting ethic codes. However, it is believed that several reporters are not totally trusted.
To begin with, it is true that professional journalists is not believed because of wide spreading the sensational information in order to gain popularity by posting in electronic media, disobeying the moral codes of journalism, being a source of misinformation. That is to say, when they report the sensation of issue, this attracts citizens’ emotion to respond the published news, which are tended to be hoaxes. For example, the vast majority of reporters in Indonesia may be most likely to capture the moment of celebrities, and exaggerate it. What is more, Indonesian will be stimulated to bombard either bad or good words in social media, such as Twitter and Facebook, so that this has not followed the journalism ethic and people do not respect it.
Nevertheless, it is argued that some journalists are trusted, because they utilize the media as the distribution of well-valued digital news, following the moral regulation of journalism. Thanks to technology development, although there are a number of hoaxes, it can be outbalanced by those finding the vital information about updated issues in the world. BBC reporters, for instance, always publish vital news in BBC. Com, such as environmental and economy one, to inform global population about the change in those topics. Furthermore, it is high-qualified due to using data and fast posting in a day, having a tendency to possess a fraud of exaggerating the information. Therefore, it is false if several journalists have negative attitudes in terms of finding bad news.
In conclusion, it is a firm belief that not all reporters are worse, plethora of them are still concerned on important topic. Where possible, accessing trust media is a must avoid the negativity in digital world of misinformation in some websites.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, then, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41304347826 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1869891451 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2318911045 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.285714286 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344522531995 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139821080307 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714805441757 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193642824076 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644142724334 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.