Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
In the recent years, many scientists have used many spices of animal in experiments. Some people think that it brings many benefits for human, while I personally believe that it is unethical to do that.
There are some good reasons in using animal to research. Firstly, scientists use animals to develop and improve medicines. For example, when they create a new medicine animals in experiments will use, they will observe reflection of those animals and give results, which helps them enhance the medicine and produce other medicines. Secondly, by experimenting on animals, scientists can know side-effect of medicines, so they can predict impacts of them to humanity quite exactly. Therefore, some patients might be more safe when using the medicines. In serious situations, medicines cause animals to die, it will not be sold on the market.
However, I think that these experiments are unethical. Because animals which are used in experiments have to suffer a lot of pain before they die. For instance, they use many medicines that lead to many diseases, which makes them be injured and feel scared. They are isolated and they have to face terrible things lonely. These experiments are unfair to animals because it only carries benefits to people. If these experiments continuously accomplish, people will become more cruel and selfish.
In conclusion, there are many good reasons both for and against experimenting on animals, but I think that it should be banned because it is morally wrong.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | Dongz Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | longpm2k | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Arden Nguyen | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Arden Nguyen | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Arden Nguyen | 61 | view |
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams 89
- The table shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 56
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 56
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
- The pie chart below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lieve that it is unethical to do that. There are some good reasons in using ani...
^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...menting on animals, scientists can know side-effect of medicines, so they can predict impac...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ie, it will not be sold on the market. However, I think that these experiments ...
^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...k that these experiments are unethical. Because animals which are used in experiments h...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le will become more cruel and selfish. In conclusion, there are many good reaso...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21810699588 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73873800701 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4371813713 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367645545058 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128467812263 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660681907345 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207476517073 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639425916359 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.