Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give opinion
The widen use of animal in testing new drugs for human remains controvesal among concering people. While some people hold the solid opinion that these trial tests should be banned due to moral issues, it is my perspective that we should carry out this work under control.
On the one hand, it is argued that testing on animinal lives results in ethical issues. The advocators of this viewpoint suppose that no specie, even though human, have the right to test on the live of others. Therefore, it is by no mean acceptable for animnal to suffer from paints of experiment as all natural creatures hold equal chance to live. Besides, testing on animal sometime cause change in genius, which could give birth of new habitats. This is conducve to the opposite of natural improvement processes.
On the other hand, I reckon that carry out experiments on animals is nescessary in some way. Firstly, a wide range of usful medicines has been born as results of reseach on animals. Hardly could we apply the experiment; especialy dangerous ones, on human without trials on rat or bird at early stages. Additionally, without the introduction of valuable drugs or vacines, human would be put in jeopardies with abandance of illness and virus. Secondly, I do believe that we have sufficient laws and regulations on restricting the use of animal in labotory. By following the rules, scientists ensure to eliminate the threats of ethical problems.
In conclusion, although there are some ideas of banning the experiment on animals on the ground of ethical issues, I do accept that carrying these tests are replaceble.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | Dongz Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | longpm2k | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Arden Nguyen | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Arden Nguyen | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Arden Nguyen | 61 | view |
- Fossil fuels (Coal, oil and natural gas) are the main source in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind or solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think that it is positive or negative development? 78
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 84
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The widen use of animal in testing new drugs for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minate the threats of ethical problems. In conclusion, although there are some i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i reckon, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99256505576 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69328738437 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3584033352 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309727512787 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874988118976 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786105783233 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183211795737 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495788659553 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.