Evidence suggests that a celebrity's income is vastly greater in comparison to politicians. Admittedly, it is because of their reputation between people that simplify making money. From my point of view, it could be a positive development which undoubtedly affects society.
To begin with, the most rational justification that leads to celebrity's wealth is popularity. Celebrities almost have got countless fans who follow and support them. To put it differently, they are the center of concentration which is the most crucial way to earn money. Starting a business or advertising are two important activities that are done by celebrities. Take movie stars or athletes such as soccer players who mostly have a cafe, restaurant or even gym as an example. They introduce their businesses in social networks and ask their followers to come and join and use facilities which presented. They, furthermore use this reputation to acquire advertisements for markets. A good illustration of this is musicians and actors who put on brand dresses and invite their fans to be dress like them. they earn a great amount of money by this type of advertisements.
This in turn will be a positive development. interacting with people a lot especially by social media, celebrities have a good understanding of people's problems. The more some stars earn money the more they help charities. Take Angelina Julie who adapts orphans and poor children as an example. She always performs humanitarian activities and vastly attempts to extend peace in the world and eliminate poverty. Some other celebrities also pay high capital expenditures on charitable activities from providing food for poverty to establishing schools for children in deprived areas.
In conclusion, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that celebrities' reputation causes earn more money in comparison to the rest of the jobs. From my point of view, that is a positive development significantly in charity activities.
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think that old people need to live in special communities but others believe they should live with their family and adult children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 67
- the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 806, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...nvite their fans to be dress like them. they earn a great amount of money by this ty...
^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Interacting
...in turn will be a positive development. interacting with people a lot especially by social ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
...rational conclusion to be drawn is that celebrities reputation causes earn more money in co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33018867925 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1354030592 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569182389937 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0562402505 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.75 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234665199389 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679954030721 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578764215966 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146546792129 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302897374169 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 806, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...nvite their fans to be dress like them. they earn a great amount of money by this ty...
^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Interacting
...in turn will be a positive development. interacting with people a lot especially by social ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
...rational conclusion to be drawn is that celebrities reputation causes earn more money in co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33018867925 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1354030592 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569182389937 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0562402505 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.75 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234665199389 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679954030721 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578764215966 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146546792129 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302897374169 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.