Nowadays, celebrities increasingly have status of role models, in particular for younger people
Nowadays, in our thriving world the pace of our life at the rapid stage, day by day the number of famous peoples are increasing because of development in the world. They become popular in a diverse sphere such as science, art, technology, etc. Most of them are good, and some of them are bad. They gain popularity because of young generations that are always resembling their lifestyle, fashion and sometimes behave similarly and pursue on various social websites. I believe that there is no contradictory effect of it, but they should keep the distance and try to be as themselves.
First of all, the famous peoples are equivalent. There are similar to, working-class peoples but they are popular-priced. Predominantly, it does not inform, that simple citizen should imitate them and be their bipartisan. If prominence commits a heroic deed, it may be an underlying reason for copying not other actions, such as smoking cigarettes. Explicitly, it affects in a wrong way that makes youngsters more discourteous.
Secondly, the admirable person of followers should be their parents. Due to the number of reasons, first, they provide with clothes, money and other needs. Secondly, they sent children to school or college to acquire knowledge. In my point of view, they can also sacrifice their life for their children if it is needed. For these reasons, we should respect them and support when they face hardships or help to tackle issues. Undoubtedly, there are no needs for reflecting star because they have origins.
In conclusion, all megastars are not examples of duplicating, but many of them are adorable and young followers can do it, but they are not as good as parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-02 | hoangnv | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | ngonguyetminhthu | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | amberrrrrrr | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-20 | sumitra gautam | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | yellow_pus | 61 | view |
- With the increasing use and development of new technology,many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform 61
- The diagram below show the life of the salmon 84
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people 67
- The diagram below show the life of the salmon 78
- Nowadays, celebrities increasingly have status of role models, in particular for younger people 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an. If prominence commits a heroic deed, it may be an underlying reason for copyi...
^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng reason for copying not other actions, such as smoking cigarettes. Explicitly, ...
^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...king cigarettes. Explicitly, it affects in a wrong way that makes youngsters more discourteous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06810035842 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84296050435 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1007232789 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1764705882 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0859998694666 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.02707927138 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366196022666 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0466735405026 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273982269009 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.