Nowadays, families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this.
Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society.
In recent time families are not as close as they used to be. The reasons for this could be the increased competition and technological advancement. People are busy with other aspects of life and they do not have enough time to nurture their relationships with their family members. These could result in increased stress and frustration, as well as serious psychological disorders.
Family is the building block of a society, where members of a family used to act as a single unit in the society. However, the distance among families are increasing day by day. And we can hold the blame for the changing social structure and system. Nowadays the world is much more competitive and people are simply too busy to spend quality time with their families. This leads to the prospect of growing distance among them. And people are getting used to it, mainly because of the recent technological advancements, which allow them to resort to a whole new world. They are interacting with people on the other side of the world that hinders their realization of the distance from their families. Everyone lives in his/her own social bubble, which often excludes family.
Although not readily visible, the lack of closeness in families can lead to so many negative consequences. Human beings are evolved to be in a family. So any violation of that is going to have devastating effects. It can cause increased tension and frustration, which sometimes even lead to mental illness. And if it continues, at a point the whole social structure will collapse.
After saying all this, due to the changes in the structure of our world and social values, families are getting more distant. And this may be the reason for the destruction of our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-08 | jagrit sharma | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-08 | jagrit sharma | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Shahrear59 | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-09 | ziahasan | 81 | view |
| 2016-09-21 | ekam98765 | 70 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 61
- Increasing price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. 67
- chinese urban expenditure 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Other, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93174061433 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72675100736 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532423208191 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.234556261 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.0526315789 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4210526316 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236997687315 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714790602164 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072211565806 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149117528805 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503586023173 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.