The table below give the information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

Essay topics:

The table below give the information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

The tables show the amount of sales of bananas and coffee in five European countries in 1999 and 2004. As seen from the table for coffee, it is evident that 2004 has seen a significantly larger sales than that of 1999, namely 3 times.

In the data for sales of coffee in 1999, the greatest sales took place in Switzerland, 3 millions of euros, immediately after which stands Denmark, with 1.8 million euros of sales. Then there are UK, Belgium and Sweden, in descending order in terms of sales.

For coffee sales in 2004, UK had an enormous increase in coffee sales, from 1.5 million in 1999 to 20 million. Other countries also had increase in sales, but not much compared to UK. Switzerland doubled its’ sales, whereas the other two had a little increase compared to that.

From the chart for banana sales, we see that in 1999 the biggest sale was in Switzerland, 15 million euros. The other countries had little sales in comparison to Switzerland. In 2004 sales in Switzerland increased by more than 3 times that of 1999, to 47 million euros. Among other countries UK had a significant increase in banana sales, with more than 5 times that of 1999. Belgium also had a good increase in sales. But the other two countries had a decrease in sales.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 Pham Mai Nguyet 56 view
2020-01-18 Noah1997 67 view
2020-01-18 Noah1997 67 view
2019-12-25 el-naz 67 view
2019-11-16 yeu192 78 view
Essays by user Shahrear59 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...eatest sales took place in Switzerland, 3 millions of euros, immediately after which stands D...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65470852018 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.510497977 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484304932735 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4192735329 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8461538462 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46153846154 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204527200555 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974368158269 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121040892462 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164737867428 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11173601499 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.