Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor.
Do you think this is positive or negative development.
This becomes a very hot agreement that by growing the technology and internet which represent numerous different medical sites people prefer use alternative drug and medicines from these sites to visit usual doctor. In my opinion, some time that the disease is minor people can use medicines whit out visiting doctor but in serious disease people should visit doctor immediately.
On the one side, most of ordinary people when get sick prefer check the internet and select a drug which suggest in different sites. This might very danger for person who does not have any medical background to use these drugs while if you have a little knowledge about your disease can consume it. It is true just for minor diseases such as cold and headache.
On the other side, never should any pay attention to other advices when you have serious health problem such as heart disease and blood sugar. In such situation the host person has to visit an especial and specialist doctor and follow his/her instructions. Despite you must be check up every month the report to your doctor. Some people think these monthly checkups does not necessary and don’t care about that while might face with serious problem when don’t do it.
Finally, although recently people have tendency to self-curing led to different sites it has lots of negative affects in long term and in serious diseases. Hence, it would be better that have an appointment and visit doctor. the sicks because of that don’t give money to doctors select alternative methods to be get good. It is common in ordinary people todays.
In conclusion, technology can help people to prevent go to doctor when don’t have serious disease. When a person get sick should visit doctor if not have lots of negative effects some time led to death.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | zanzendegi | 56 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 67
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...technology and internet which represent numerous different medical sites people prefer use alterna...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...t have an appointment and visit doctor. the sicks because of that don’t give money ...
^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egative effects some time led to death.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91089108911 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34096948139 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2435100552 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230991401793 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765030676182 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473692864666 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131160643072 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638885248369 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.