Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In modern society’s today, worldwide tourism which is the biggest sector in the global economy leads to many nerves between the local and foreign visitors. While others say that more conflicts will happen, I would argue that raising inhabitants’ awareness from various cultures could be gained more.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why international tourism results in many nervous issues between both sides. The first reason is that tourists those who ignore conservations and the traditional values of other countries tend to jeopardize historical monuments. These visitors, for instance, often draw pictures on the wall of ancient buildings being constructed thousands of years ago, and they also deliberately litter at their convenience. All of which makes the local depress foreign tourists as well as not welcoming them. Moreover, the lack of safety in the tourism sites of nations has driven many thefts and pickpocketing related to tourists; therefore they keep unfriendly attitudes to local people.
On the other hand, I believe that worldwide tourism heightens people’s consciousness of countries’ cultures more. Firstly, besides travelling to stunning sceneries, tourists may adapt to new cultural features such as having traditional foods and experiencing to wear costumes which they share to their friends and relatives. Hence, this helps promote the images and evoke understanding of nations as well. In addition, frequently interacting to tourists, the local has the chances to adopt novel ideas, stimulating their curiosity and encouraging themselves to open horizons. Stories about modern civilizations from visitors, for example, would lead to the local presidents’ expansion of social circles, the needs of acquiring foreign languages and real-life experiences through travelling overseas.
In conclusion, although there are tensions having occurred to both local citizens and visitors with the development of international tourism, I am the opinion that this industry sensitize people from distinct cultures more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | Dhruv8807 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | D87eepak | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | IVANTRUONG | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Dishant | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | asdfgzxcvb | 84 | view |
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment We should discourage non essential flight rather than limit the use of cars To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- owning a gun 67
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people Others think education will not work 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84918032787 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08474935465 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64262295082 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8902730408 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.230769231 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6923076923 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154762421991 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545048848908 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726919897892 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116147326021 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836971435158 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.