Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films. Digital technology enables anyone to produce films. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is undeniable that thanks to state-of-the-art technology, many people in the day and age have an opportunity to ease the process of producing films, which is supposed that only big film brands could fulfill. I believe that this development results in both merits and drawbacks.
Due to the improvement and innovation of digital gadgets nowadays, people especially the young could easily nurture their dream of producing films when they are still students. In other words, a smartphone, an actor, a proper background, and a cameraman are all the things that these people need to create a film, and then show them on the network sites. Based on these benefits, this would help to reinforce the film industry in a certain nation because the creativity of youngsters is potential and diverse. For instance, a young male group named 1996 in Vietnam has achieved one of the most prestigious awards in the film industry with some basic tools, and intriguing content.
However, the negative impacts of this change are inevitable when many sensitive and toxic films have been produced and showed on many different social network sites. More importantly, these hazardous contents affect adversely viewers’ perception and awareness, especially children who are unable to control their habits or assess bad aspects of these films. Take an action film as an example. This kind of movie produces unlimited violent and horrible scenes, which are broadcasted on Youtube without the supervision of parents. Consequently, this could make children suffer from bad behaviors.
In conclusion, although it is beneficial for youngsters and the film industry when the technology creates a chance to broaden the diversity of films, the disadvantages also impact hugely our society’s awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | Trandinhphuc8.0 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | kieutrangkg1 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | kieutrangkg1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mirajanecute | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 87 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
- The graph below shows information about the total oil consumption of four major consumers from 2009 to 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which solution is better 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 84
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... films have been produced and showed on many different social network sites. More importantly,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, still, then, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35943060498 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87959075343 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626334519573 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8655211882 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181571040736 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629555236548 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322338474221 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105562124723 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174442992847 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.