The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001
The line graph and the table compare how many trips UK residents had to other foreign countries for different purposes during a 10-year period.
It is clear that UK individuals travelled more through the years. Noticeably, the number of trips for holidays was by far the highest during the research period.
In 1989, there were around 30 million trips for vacations while the number of visits for business was the second-highest figure in the chart, at just under 10 million. Meanwhile, the figures for family visits and other purposes were lower, ranging from 5 to 6 million visits.
In 2001, the quantity of visits for recreational purposes dropped dramatically to just under 40 million trips, despite a sharp increase in 1998. At the same time, the year 2001 witnessed slight decreases in the figures for business trips and other purposes to around 8 million and 3 million trips respectively. By contrast, UK residents took more family-related trips, with its figure to approximately 12 million. In addition, although the total of trips for all purposes rose constantly from 1989 to 1998, the number of all trips went down slightly to only 61 million in total in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-29 | miminguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | Lâm Yên Chi | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | quynhtran8 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 73 | view |
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which solution is better 78
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 78
- Task 2 In some cultures children are often told they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 67
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- TASK 1 The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03571428571 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7355837343 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7069692682 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368889637772 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154481434421 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854577362687 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232916669949 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846618935664 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.