Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with

Essay topics:

Nowadays in many countries women have full-time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with

The number of women working full time has been increasing significantly during recent years result in an idea that their gender counterparts should share household chores with them. I am convinced that household duties should be shared equally for several reasons.
First and foremost, due to the fact that now women can work full time in order to support their family financially better, they have to suffer from stressful pressure from their workplace as men. Therefore, they should have more time for relaxing at home, leading to the need of sharing housework equally. Secondly, some typical household chores are more suitable for men, who have better physical strength, than women. For instance, repairing machines is an easy task for men but women can struggle to do it. Moreover, doing housework together is also a good way to strengthen relationships between members of families because cooperation can help them understand others better.
Some opponents of sharing household duties argue that males who usually have higher positions in the workplace, need to work harder than women so they are not responsible for housework. However, females are also of great importance in many companies and organizations as their counterparts. In fact, there are several female CEO, businesswomen, or prime minister. Moreover, women, who have to suffer from inequality in the past, should be given more benefits and care from men.
To sum up, I once again reaffirm my position that both men and women should devote their spare time to do household chores. In the future, I believe that we should raise children’s awareness of gender equality.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-10 Andet 89 view
2021-09-08 tuongvytn2893 73 view
2020-07-07 vinay_vp372 61 view
2020-05-26 hieunganngan 61 view
2020-05-26 hieunganngan 47 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
The number of women working full time has been increasing significantly durin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e shared equally for several reasons. First and foremost, due to the fact that...
^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...due to the fact that now women can work full time in order to support their family financ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n help them understand others better. Some opponents of sharing household duti...
^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... given more benefits and care from men. To sum up, I once again reaffirm my posi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in fact, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23863636364 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71622340855 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.028781931 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.384615385 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262092978001 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914646574412 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565301794344 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161423714613 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325943149206 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.