Human beings have encountered distant areas such as the North pole and South pole. Although the advantages of this advancement are indisputable, the drawbacks have been confirmed to prior it. This essay will discuss the reasons which lead to my assumption.
Since the first appearance of humanity started to exist, discovering and conquering this planet has been a universal goal. Unfolding new places has several benefits. First of all, is the modification of human's knowledge about new creatures, species, etc. For example, by exploring the South pole, penguins are found and widely known. The second perk is the finance rise which is constructed from tourism. People would build curiosity about unknown species and destinations, and who is financially capacity would dedicate to pay for a tour, a penguin communicating show for instance.
Despite its numerous satisfactions, we must aware of the consequences since it gradually covered the advantages. To begin with, natural areas which are invaded by humans scarcely demonstrate a legal result. The exploitation would lead to the decline of species and intense contamination or even worse, climate change. A prime example, the Mau Son Mountain in Lang Son was a magnificent scenery with an overwhelming view and natural vibe, otherwise, as humans have occupied this place for tourism purposes, now it is reported as nothing but a trash mountain. In addition, wild animals will have to face the threat of losing their habitat or being used for human goods. Consequently, these species will progressively disappear. We have witnessed the impairment of polar bears, explicitly shown in their outlook: skinny bodies and substandard fur. If this keeps prolonged, the extinction of these will be seen in the nearby future. Last but not least, since climate change is triggering, our health will accelerate worse.
In conclusion, although this development's benefits are undeniable, nevertheless, humans have to remain conscious about the cons which are strongly surpassing the pros.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- In the past people stored knowledge in books nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 84
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...elerate worse. In conclusion, although this developments benefits are undeniable, n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41324921136 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9676009595 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640378548896 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3884434997 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3157894737 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6842105263 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898403055385 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282155237258 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433260925804 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671973469184 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581582358035 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.