Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face, is this a positive or negative development?
In today’s society, rather than taking part in direct communication, people tend to do this through the Internet network. Some believe that this phenomenon is beneficial for people while I do state that the disadvantage outweighs these.
Firstly, online socialization can result in negativities in people's daily life. This has been shown that the more addicted to virtual life, the harder development of crucial skills can be gained such as communication skills or problem-solving skills. This is because people spend the majority of their time chatting with others through social platforms like Facebook and Instagram, therefore, being indifferent in interacting with others in reality. As a consequence, it is hard for people to find a good job or building up attachment in relationships afterward.
Additionally, this phenomenon also leads to a detrimental effect on people's psychology. Communication is indeed a very basic demand of each person. If people lack direct communication and emotional support, the lonely feeling and even isolation from society will be deeply rooted in people's minds. For example, many people suffer mental disorders like depression or insomnia, which their physical health even be affected.
Moreover, people choosing online interactions can be exposed to violated privacy. Because of the communication with fake identities or anonymous accounts, the personal information of users is likely to be stolen. Taking the commercial aspect as an example, some people take advantage of this for the wrong purposes such as selling it to third parties at sky-high prices.
In conclusion, there are opposing opinions about whether socialize online is positive or not. With these aforementioned ideas, I am subscribed to the view that this kind of communication brings a much greater negative influence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | citra orwela | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Vinuki | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 84 | view |
- The pie charts show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005 100
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in a global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your view 89
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12475305147 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639285714286 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4633148978 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.533333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248153027583 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817312554715 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553175865005 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132505902997 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357270338979 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.