Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
Currently, more individuals choose to converse virtually rather than in person. While online relationships enable the communities to undoubtedly play a role in maintaining friendships and interact with people who share the same interests, I believe that this would lead to drawbacks lacking many characteristics of successful links such as trust and expression of body language.
Engaging online would not build stronger connections among the ones involved in the friendship. In addition, building trust and personal touch could lead to a sense of community and camaraderie, leading to a retaining working relationship. When meeting a person, in reality, getting to know them, shaking hands for instance and hearing their voice would go a longer distance. Even if it's getting to know what kind of dog they have or where they would go for vacation, would not be a feature of a professional Zoom meeting call working with mics and video cameras. A colleague or a friend would never feel the same connection to you when via a text message, whereas a personal meeting would lead to full attention. Efficiency and engagement personally, would enrich the relationship and be more collaborative than a half-hour meeting
Interacting in person would improve better non-verbal understanding. It's not just about talking, where there is more extensive dimension of body language, such as how the person is feeling. A clear example illustrates personal interaction promotes behaviour that cannot be obtained via email, over the phone or even video chat. Furthermore, seeing their hands and legs would enclose you with a better idea of where you are at. Based on non-verbal cues, you can change your tactics or even the tone you are talking, from formal to informal. Body cues, speak better than words, inviting participation has better impact than having other conferencing technologies
In conclusion, holding team meetings and zoom calls promote more friendships where the people would have similar interests and wishes, however, a link between people is much more than that, requiring trust and understanding each other which is the key part in leading to a successful conversation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | citra orwela | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Vinuki | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 84 | view |
- Wearing uniforms is popular in schools but some people argue that this might cause damage to children s individuality What is your opinion 61
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 89
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 87
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33913043478 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98373945129 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.2937906597 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.692307692 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5384615385 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102963607014 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408512924808 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596200119258 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848582237666 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562112001723 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.