The chart below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six science-related subjects at a UK University in 2009. Summarize the information, by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The given bar chart illustrates the gender distribution of students conducting research across a range of fields at a University in the UK IN 2009.
Overall, the proportion of male students who carried out research was higher than the female researchers across five of the disciplines followed. However, the pattern differs with Veterinary Medicine where women outnumbered men. The number of research students following Astronomy and Geology was the same.
The highest was observed in the study of Biology where about 235 male students were occupied along with 200 females. There was a significant amount of men compared to women across three of the subjects: Physics, Astronomy, and Geology. The gender gap between students pursuing Physics was nearly five times as many male students than females.
The exception to this trend is with the course of Veterinary Medicine where the number of women was higher than men (115 vs. 90). Furthermore, the ratios between each gender across Biology, Medicine and Veterinary Medicine was roughly equally represented. The domination of men in Astronomy and Geology was equal in number (approximately 150 students).
- ome people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry physics and history should be taught in schools while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects such as motor mechanics and cooking Discuss both views 78
- In many countries today parents are able to choose to send their children to single sex schools or co educational schools Some people think that children going to single sex schools have disadvantages later in life To what extent do you agree 73
- All children should be given a free laptop when they start high school Do you agree or disagree 10
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 89
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4364640884 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77960407864 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6364749906 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162259938505 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720306927777 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636594019303 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121311071946 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677477848747 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.