It is not an infrequent situation that the majority of nations try to ameliorate life qualities through economic innovation at the price of losing social values. From where I stand, I firmly convinced that the drawbacks overweight the benefits in the long term.
It is not denied that, firstly, boosting economic development is workable for improving living standard. The dominant indicator of life quality is finance. In other words, constructions of infrastructures like hospitals and schools require foundations and investments. Together with tackling social problems such as inequality needs a large amount of welfare. Without enough money, nothing can be done despite there are other factors which might needs. For that very reason, economic development is essential for the movement.
Nonetheless, lacking social values might counteract the financial improvements in various domains. To begin with, promote financial processes no doubt need some workforce. The labor, however, requires outlets to ease their burden occurred in intensive work. The outlets are aesthetics or simply amusement in most cases. Lacking social values might result in less entertainment for those workers and then lead to monotony or even contradiction in their works. Those negative moods definitely lower the standard of living.
On the other hand, being too commercial could undermine the income especially for tourism. Merely chasing for economic achievement sometimes lead to differentiation loss. To be more specific, if a country alters its tourists’ attractions to meet travels’ needs, in other words, lose their social and natural characteristics. The spots might are no longer attractive since these all look the same. The economic benefits can be undermined and natives would not be satisfied with those massive changes in their home.
All in all, I will shed light on the comprehensive development to improve the living standard but not just for the economy.
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 78
- The three pie charts show the proportion of four kinds of vehicles used in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, then, no doubt, such as, in most cases, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57525083612 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00503859081 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5923192975 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.35 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.95 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161388360424 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427017617655 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435485725207 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855240021569 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273127516333 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.49 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.