It is a common phenomenon that universities are no longer limited in traditional classes but give long distance web teaching qualifications today. From where I stand, the innovation benefits overweight its drawbacks in current situations.
Firstly, overseas online courses offer a golden chance for those learners who have difficulties. For instance, commuters often found themselves could not squeeze enough time to get further studies due to the regular timetable in orthodox education. nonetheless, the flexible curriculum can be given through the use of the internet. For this very reason, the development is practical for them to balance their works and studies. Likewise, for those who have a tight budget and can not afford the high expands on roads, offering long distant education might ease their burden.
Following this, the intensity of educational resources may be relieved by distant learning. To be more specific, online courses enable more accommodating students in comparison to traditional face to face classes. Prestigious schools, such as have a possible opportunity to keep up more outstanding students. With more access to high-quality teaching, more possible elites might be provided to society to contribute in all kind of domains.
The drawbacks, nonetheless, are no denied exist for the fewer monitor thanks to the attachment. students who face the screens could be distracted easily without supervision from classroom circumstances and eventually lead to poor academic performance. In addition, they hardly receive personal advice and response due to the shallow connection between teachers and them. In other words, they may have little inkling about their perception of learning. However, the problem can be tackled by adding more small tests and giving more opportunities for them to get in touch with lecturers.
All in all, I will shed light on the advantages of distance learning are larger despite the fact that online lectures have a long way to go to be more workable for the students.
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- The three pie charts show the proportion of four kinds of vehicles used in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 78
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 84
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nonetheless
...egular timetable in orthodox education. nonetheless, the flexible curriculum can be given t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...fewer monitor thanks to the attachment. students who face the screens could be distracte...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, nonetheless, so, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41139240506 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96439778405 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629746835443 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9009763847 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.588235294 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104898540665 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323581454699 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031989477677 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619915611 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364306029576 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.