Mandatory education requires students to address the importance of learning subjects earnestly. Nevertheless, there is a dispute that young learners should concentrate on the subjects which they like or good at instead in all fields. From where I stand, adolescent should get comprehensive education but not merely in the same domain.
Firstly, it is no denying that everyone has their interests, several students possess talents in some areas. In that occasion, pay attention to the specific subjects will help the performance and efficiency in their study due to the motivation while passion occurs.
However, the youngster(aged 12-16) are raw and immature in most cases. So it is a common phenomenon that they change their minds. To be more specific, if they found out the subject is not entertaining anymore during further studies, they might have an arduous process to change to other fields and catch up with peers. By contrast, learning all kinds of courses can help them understand themselves such as what they truly like.
What else, comprehensive education helps them improve themselves to be competent in the job hunting. For instance, math is not just about to multiply and divide, nonetheless, the logical and rational thought is what adolescents truly need to learn. Hone more skills and consider things differently and respectively no doubt will meet the decent occupations’ need.
All in all, I firmly convinced that comprehensive education is better for teens. Of course, they can opt the domain they want when they are old enough to understand those various subjects’ inner thought.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 78
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The three pie charts show the proportion of four kinds of vehicles used in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, while, for instance, no doubt, of course, such as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30078125 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95434157728 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6640625 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1040574521 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218599281609 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669059608617 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699760801815 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114990076543 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798109174984 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.