Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on society?
In contemporary settings, students all over the world are allowed to choose their own study curriculum in their universities. However, there exists a shortage in the number of students who opt to learn science subjects. In the following essay, I will discuss some causes of this phenomenon and the impacts it has on society.
To commence, the lack of science students in many universities these days is attributable to a number of factors. Firstly, it is because of the complexity of the subjects. Taking maths, physics and chemistry as examples, those subjects require students to learn a plethora of metrics, which is easily mistaken. Thus, students will definitely find those challenging to learn, let alone apply to tackle their homework. Additionally, this kind of subjects seems to lack of creation, making them less appealing to students. In contrast to Art, for instance, where pupils created their own world and visualize it into their pictures and products, students in the realms of science subjects have to learn banal lessons without the assistance of vibrant images and their freedom to create things. Thus, the majority of students will be hesitant to choose these subjects that can not interest them.
As serious as the problem is, the lack of students in science faculties resulted in a variety of consequences. Obviously, this disturbs the market equilibrium, leading to human resource insufficiency in numerous fields. To exemplify, the fewer students choose to study biology, the fewer doctors society has in the far future. As the healthcare system is of paramount importance, this undoubtedly does harm to society. Likewise, the case is identical to the engineering or architecture field. More than that, another noteworthy effect is the waste of knowledge. Humans' ancestors have tried and experimented in thousands of ways to cultivate a huge amount of knowledge, particularly in the realms of science subjects, which provokes the development of society. Should their descendants be unwilling to adopt those immense achievements, not only their attempt is meaningless but their descendants also will not be knowledgeable enough to develop a more flourished society.
In summary, distinct reasons are currently contributing to the lack of science students and this development exerts adverse impacts on society. Resultantly, in order to ensure the holistic development of society in the long run, authorities should be aware of the case and have potential solutions to deal with it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-21 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | thaokim2003 | 84 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | RkmsU | 73 | view |
- People should look after their health as a duty to the society where they live rather than for their own benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
... will definitely find those challenging to learn, let alone apply to tackle their homewo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, so, thus, for instance, in contrast, in summary, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36455696203 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9969979104 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541772151899 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7039446197 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.95 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228795480727 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635073461764 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449886311151 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129990131173 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284239271862 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.