The line graph illustrates how many gadgets was owned and how long did residents in a nation spend to do the household chores from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, there was an increase in the households using the appliances, and the number of refrigerator used by family surpassed that of refrigerator and vacuum cleaner from 1940 onwards. In contrast, due to the development of technology, people tend to allocate less time for housework than they used to.
The proportion of households with refrigerator started at about only 1% in 1920, after which it rose dramatically to south of 50% in 1940, and then surpassed the percentage of the other 2 sectors with a growth to 100% in 1980 and remained unchanged untill the last year of the period. Similar changes can be seen in the figure for washing machine and vacuum cleaner, which increased subsequently from 30% and 40% in 1920 to 70% in 1960. From 1960 onwards, the percentage of vacuum cleaner continued to rise to 100% in 2019 while refrigerator was followed by a slight fall to nearly 65% in 1980 and a final rise to about 75% in 2019.
The number of hours of housework in 1920 was 50, but this figure fell substantially to 20 hours in 1960. From 1960, the amount of time people spent doing chores declined gradually to only 10 hours in the last year of the period.
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE BECOMING INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OR BUILDING THEY LINE IN WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THIS HOW CAN PEOPLE RESEARCH THIS 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates how many gadg...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he household chores from 1920 to 2019. Overall, there was an increase in the ho...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time for housework than they used to. The proportion of households with refrig...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and a final rise to about 75% in 2019. The number of hours of housework in 1920...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62820512821 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66509445763 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6018257479 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.375 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122330097886 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567405767168 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279152784099 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078040428084 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235830200899 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.