Nowadays, people have little awareness of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world?
In this day and age, a lack of connection between humans and nature are emerging in a civilized society. From my perspective, this phenomenon is attributed to the urbanization of cities associated with the modern way of life, and promoting activities and urban planning prioritizing green spaces should be adopted to mitigate the issue.
First and foremost, a limited awareness among people about the paramount importance of the natural world may be triggered by the urban sprawl of metropolitans. The fact of the matter is that the urbanization not only turns the ecosystem of flora and fauna into concrete jungles but eliminates green spaces as well. For example,hills and forests covering the green color of flora are gradually supplanted by the skyscrapers for accommodation. Another point to consider is that the advent of technology drives people to indulge in the virtual world. In other words, in the life of cutting-edge technology, children engross in digital entertainment and adults occupy with work and leisure pursuits. People have been progressively distanced from the natural world, consequently, this shift can accidentally form the wide gap between humans and the habitat.
To tackle this problem, implementing urban planning prioritizing green spaces is one of the most fruitful methods. In fact, this solution refers to the network of natural or semi-natural green spaces, such as urban forests, green roofs, providing multiple ecological, social, and economic merits. For instance, governments start to allocate the budget to green amenities such as amusement parks, … to give dwellers opportunities to enhance public health as well as engage with nature. Additionally, promoting outdoor activities such as gardening serves as a good way. More specifically, these activities represent for benign campaigns to the environment. Hence, they could afford people the chance to become more acquainted with the environment and raise awareness of the interdependence of human life and nature.
In conclusion, on an individual level, I reckon that each person needs to make concerted efforts to foster a direct connection between individuals and the natural world and develop a profound respect for the environment.
- The table show the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 2005 million
- It is often said that crime is a result of societal conditions and poverty not individual character To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph shows Paris metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some feel that punishment should focus more on rehabilitation instead of long prison term Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Nowadays people have little awareness of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hills
...inates green spaces as well. For example,hills and forests covering the green color of...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 681, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...e environment. Hence, they could afford people the chance to become more acquainted wi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51453488372 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09996461668 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.806950235 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.466666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222612317474 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072451907117 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916563617018 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123292354877 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886503158416 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.