Nowadays some countries encourage people to buy more and more products, which is good for economy. While others believe it is bad for the society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, some nations tend to urge their citizens to make more and more purchases. While I agree that this trend will benefit these countries’ economy to some extent, I still believe that it will cause detrimental effects on the society.
On the one hand, people’s consuming more and more products may be advantageous for the development of a country’s economy. It is because when people’s demands for consumer goods increase, manufacturers have to generate more products and thus, gaining back more profits. In addition, this trend helps create more job opportunities for people, who are necessary to manufacture sufficient goods to meet these demands. This may considerably contribute to the general development of a country economically
On the other hand, I believe that uncontrolled consumption will create a throw-away society, which may lead to unpredicted problems for people’s life. To be specific, following the shopping trend, people may waste their money on unecessary things just because they want to keep up with the latest trends and show off to other people. For example, there are those who are willing to buy the latest version of iPhone and the newest bag model of Channel, which are considered the implications of wealth and success, even though their current phones and bags are still new and usable. Moreover, encouraging the public to buy more may introduce a negative habit towards consumption. When people are used to such a style of consuming, they may not hesitate to order prohibitive products by using credit card without being fully aware of its potential dangers. This may result in themselves falling into unpredictable troubles, including heavy debts.
To conclude, while pushing people to buy more goods may contribute to a country’s economic developments, I believe that this trend will gradually form a consumer society, where people willingly pour their savings into not really necessary things and possibly get into debts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-13 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 83
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Multi cultural societies in which there is a mixture of different ethnic people bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country To what extent do you agree 67
- Some people say that healthcare should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 55
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3152866242 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86855002618 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5454374829 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313019960522 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122818174996 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751486053662 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196030894022 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536881962613 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3152866242 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86855002618 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5454374829 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313019960522 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122818174996 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751486053662 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196030894022 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536881962613 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.