With today's highly competitive market, academic professions are considered as one of the most significant factors than hands-on experience by some seekers when they seek new candidates. Although there are some debations about this trend, I hold a stern belief that it has a positive movement.
To begin with, There have several underlying reasons to explain why some recruiters spend the majority of top priorities for employees, who have academic qualifications in gaining employment. Firstly, The acquisition of knowledge is the key to better career prospects, so having access to tertiary education is a life-changing opportunity for many students and formal qualification is more deserved in one knowledge-based society. For example, A person need to have an expertise qualification to be a successful doctor as well as a great deal of medical knowledge, have a deeper comprehension into their field. On top of that, they can be committed to prestigious hospitals or retained in universities to transmit knowledge by their accumulated experience. Compared to non-academic qualification, it undermines excessive time can be used in other valuable ways.
Moreover, With the advent of latter-day technologies and AI ever-changing process, It is a double-edged sword for candidates as well as very difficult to have a equal competition between non-academic qualifications and academic ones. Although the typical example can be seen in the case of Steve Jobs, a founder of Apple, who was the most successful person in technological industry without holding any formal education in this field.However, it is not synonymous with the notion that anyone is also successful and it seem to be very scarce, a non-academically qualified candidate must be superior hands-on experiences or certain achievements in specific field, thereby, they might be a potential position into an international organisations or prestigious corporations, where ten applicants are signed in, just one of which meet all the criteria they need. Therefore, Fulfilling dream of high-salary jobs or career prospects without academic qualification is more ilusory in a knowledge-based society.
In conclusion, Whatever you have hands-on experience of talented qualities, it is inevitable that acceptance rates in a high-salary job might decrease, and I hold fast to the belief that some job recruiters have some biased opinions for those who have formal academic qualifications.
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people are born to be leaders while others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give opinion 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The advantages brought by the spread of English as a global language with outweigh the disadvantage To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
With todays highly competitive market, a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elief that it has a positive movement. To begin with, There have several underl...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me can be used in other valuable ways. Moreover, With the advent of latter-day ...
^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...dates as well as very difficult to have a equal competition between non-academic ...
^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ding any formal education in this field.However, it is not synonymous with the notion t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mous with the notion that anyone is also successful and it seem to be very scarce...
^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
... that anyone is also successful and it seem to be very scarce, a non-academically q...
^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'organisation'?
Suggestion: organisation
...otential position into an international organisations or prestigious corporations, where ten ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ilusory in a knowledge-based society. In conclusion, Whatever you have hands-o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58602150538 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48555067035 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.927816791 49.4020404114 279% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.909090909 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8181818182 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229008490044 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858861300867 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398820706388 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142757162041 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028421276271 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.0946893788 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.06 50.2224549098 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.