Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or environmental problems associated with this?
Recent years have witnessed a dramatical rise of individuals who own at least a car, and this tendency has spread worldwide. Although there are several benefits human derive from their convenient mean of transport, I firmly hold the view that the advantages are pale in comparison with the drawbacks.
On one hand, there are some compelling reasons why owning an automobile has positive effects on the well-being of drivers, chief of which is that this can save us from the risks of being exposed to toxic fumes in the atmosphere. The explanation is that when people move from place to place, they might come into direct contact with the detrimental chemical compounds in the air such as the exhaust fumes from other vehicles. Therefore, they stand a chance of the development of some health problems like respiratory diseases, asthma or even lung cancer. However, it might not be the case if such motorists are able to travel inside a car, which has a professional air-conditioning system as well as an air filter. Hence commuting by cars can get rid of a large number of deleterious materials, and not only can the drivers enjoy health benefits but also avoid health deterioration.
On the other hand, despite some advantageous influences of cars on owners’ health, I believe that those benefits cannot compensate the consequences this trend toward car ownership has caused. To exemplify, in spite of a growth in the figure for worldwide car ownership, a minority of world population can not afford to buy such vehicles that cost a fortune, while the vast majority in developing countries do not have access to this mode of transport. As a matter of fact, while car owners still have a luxury to stay inside the automobiles, their vehicles would emit a noticeable amount of unhealthy fumes that contribute significantly to the mother Earth. Additionally, the victims of this social issue are not only those without cars but also the drivers themselves. If they leave their cars and have even a short walk outdoors, they might run a risk of breathing polluted air.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that owning a car gives us some benefits. Whereas the beneficiaries are limited to car owners only, the prolonged exposure to air contamination cause harmful health effects on the majority. From my perspective, the environment-concerned over the jump of cars ownership is far outweigh the potential advantages.
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 73
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish They cause water and land pollution and so they should be banned To what extend do you agree with this statement 78
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas What problems can this cause How might these problem be reduced 78
- Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation such as cost reduction and environment conservation Discuss both views and give your opi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 715, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ioning system as well as an air filter. Hence commuting by cars can get rid of a larg...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... Hence commuting by cars can get rid of a large number of deleterious materials, and not only can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... far outweigh the potential advantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, at least, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0425 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00449558995 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5775 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7138583978 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.466666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4666666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188060608295 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618815262729 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468656589671 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112055655422 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435502220309 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.