Many supermarkets sell more and more imported food products than one produced in their own country. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
It is undeniable fact that all categories of food items are easily available in every part of the world due to technology and globalisation. While it has some detrimental effects on traditional items or manufacturers, overall it has a great impact on national development. However, I will discuss all the merits and demerits of this phenomenon in subsequent paragraphs.
To embark upon, there are a plethora of benefits, if all types of food items are available in supermarkets. The most remarkable reason is people can easily purchase food items according to their choice and they have a variety of options to select items, which are fit in their budget. For instance, nowadays every food item is available on the e-commerce website, in this website people can easily purchase international food products. Afterwards, they sell it in their local market and generate a good income for a family, because of the high-tech technology people can do this type of things. Which are almost impossible some decades ago. Moreover, in today's society members have a vast knowledge about food. They believe in quality, not in quantity. So they prefer global food items, which are accurate in the ingredient and less helpful for the people. There are prime advantages of international food items in the local market.
On the flip side, there are some detrimental effects on the local market wanders and companies. The significant effect is the value of the local items can be mitigated. People are always prefer imported food products, so local people face difficulty in selling their local food items and it can affect their financial status, due to that it should be alleviated the economy of the particular country. Such as, in India someplace are famous for their local food like Rajasthan samosa and kachori are world-famous, but due to international food cone to this state. People are changing their mindset and commencing to eat these imported food items, because of this local people lose their jobs. It is one of the major concerns of the local people.
Therefore, on the basis of all the points discussed till now and by my personal experience as well, I would like to state in conclusion that imported food products are good for generating a great source of money, but the local item is disappeared day by day
- The chart below shows the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920and 2019 100
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projection till 2050 73
- Some people say that the main environment problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plan and animals Other say that there are more important environment problem 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting the particular Caribbean between 2010 2017 73
- The graph below given information about Dubai gold sales in 2002 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 595, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...logy people can do this type of things. Which are almost impossible some decades ago....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97416020672 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77462593856 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490956072351 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9983761354 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.315789474 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157278423465 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051279307334 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421030126151 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911421842531 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436892866209 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.