Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of
technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Is this a positive or negative development?
There is no doubt that technology has altered people's lives in variant levels, mainly the way they communicat. It is clear that they adapted new approches to connect with each other thanks to technology services and products. forming new styles of connection has brought benficial treats to humans modren life. which in my opinion, outwage the negative side.
Technology has developed human interaction for the better. new medium chanles has created in smart and accessable way to attract people to join. With fun and easy to use platfourms, people started to grow useing these platfourms and evantully, even up the traditional ones like phone calls. Because of the technology such as social media platfoums. It is faitul now that almost everyone has an account to connect and sociales with his/her peers and even family. Moreover, job offers often requires at least one social media active platform of the employee. it becomes a nessecity in work enviroment as well. One can develop and maintain all kind of relationships these days thanks to tech. it bring people together. for example: a relative overseas can take a video call with his aunts, one can grant a job based on his/her profile on Facebook and so on.
Even though some would reluctant new tech connction approches. due to their special prefrences of the old fashioned ways such as mailing and audio calls. claiming that it is more genuine and authentic. The most majority of those are old generations. They find it difficult to operate and use .which make it gradually hard to connect with loved ones. But, this is not comprehend the positive outcome of the new way of communication of the technology, specially for younger generations.
- Some people say that all secondary and higher secondary school students should be taught how to manage money as it is an important life skill Do you agree or disagree with this argument 56
- The picture below shows Bell Hill farm in 1976 and the changes that took place in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The picture below shows Bell Hill farm in 1976 and the changes that took place in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The picture below shows Bell Hill farm in 1976 and the changes that took place in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Is this a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Forming
...ks to technology services and products. forming new styles of connection has brought be...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...benficial treats to humans modren life. which in my opinion, outwage the negative sid...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
...loped human interaction for the better. new medium chanles has created in smart and...
^^^
Line 4, column 558, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... media active platform of the employee. it becomes a nessecity in work enviroment ...
^^
Line 4, column 691, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...elationships these days thanks to tech. it bring people together. for example: a r...
^^
Line 4, column 694, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...tionships these days thanks to tech. it bring people together. for example: a relativ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 717, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...anks to tech. it bring people together. for example: a relative overseas can take a...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s/her profile on Facebook and so on. Even though some would reluctant new tech connction...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...reluctant new tech connction approches. due to their special prefrences of the old ...
^^^
Line 6, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Claiming
...d ways such as mailing and audio calls. claiming that it is more genuine and authentic. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hey find it difficult to operate and use .which make it gradually hard to connect ...
^^
Line 6, column 369, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'comprehended'.
Suggestion: comprehended
...nnect with loved ones. But, this is not comprehend the positive outcome of the new way of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, well, at least, for example, kind of, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04593639576 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6736487069 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636042402827 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5417277432 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.15 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264366327932 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068276895404 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648078954423 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160807792849 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041262442711 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.