Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
The advancement of our modern technology has brought about a dramatic alteration in the way people communicate. This essay will first discuss the positive impact this has caused in terms of enabling people to make relationships from different parts of the world; secondly discuss that this may negatively impact children who make a new circle of unanimous friends via social media.
Relations that used to be impossible at a certain point of time, has become possible by means of the omnipresent internet. Nowadays people are able to make new acquaintances and strong relationships through social media and chatting websites. It has even become possible for couples to build long-lasting relationships and many have ended up with a happy blessed marriage. For instance, Maria. L from Australia decided to marry her boyfriend Ali from Morocco, which she met via Facebook. However, some still do not believe in online relationships and consider it as a virtual pastime.
On the other hand, children might be vulnerable to multifarious types of abuse and harassment on the internet. That is to say, children are more likely to be abused when connecting with other people whom they do not know. Because young people are rather naïve and innocent, this puts them at a higher risk of being sexually harassed or verbally abused by older people. It is, therefore, the responsibility of parents to keep track of their children’s activities on the internet. For example, a study that was carried out by Yale University showed that more than 70% of cybercrime was committed against children.
In conclusion, the primary advantage of technology is the fact that it brought the world together and enabled many people from different parts of this planet to get along and communicate. However, children are more prone to unlawful activities when making relations with strangers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-02 | MiaPhan_09 | 89 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? 84
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevantexamples from y 78
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 78
- Some people think that parents should teach their children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the best place to learn this.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 11
- Governments give lots of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been spent better elsewhere.Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22847682119 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91773717304 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599337748344 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5232849194 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.266666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223193969325 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657977779193 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592550541568 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126662114621 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222325239514 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.