Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships pp make?
Has this become a positive or negative development
It is no doubt that technology is a remarkable development in Human history. Technology has differentiated many aspects of people behavior in the past few decades. Among one of those changes, the efficiencies on the way people communicate is noticeable. This essay is going to demonstrate that the method of meeting new people has been affected the most and I believe that is a positive innovation.
The foremost human relationship reform associated with the technology is meeting new friends, especially for the hectic people. Those people are really busy and they do not have time to go out usually, and thus, meeting friends online seems like an optimal method. Securities aside, the social network allows them to be able to connect with their friends through long distances or meet a complete stranger who shares the same interest. Japan perfectly exemplifies this situation, where millions of people working over-time could make new friends. This is a testament to the positive effects of technology on how we interact with each other.
I am of the opinion that this innovation brings many advantages. Saving time is the most essential factors that consider the online relationship as a tool to broaden our social circle. Without spending time to a real meeting, people can do their own business in tandem with meeting new strangers. On a broader scale, people acquire more knowledge because of internet diversity. Meeting new people gives them an objective perspective on different life aspects or particular article. Moreover, people will be experienced cultural exchanges meeting a foreigner which boost their understanding of others country
In conclusion, I concur with the opinion that the internet has a considerable bearing on the human relationship in a positive way.
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 78
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 78
- Some people think that the excessive use of smart phones badly affects teenagers’ literacy skills 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technologyIn what ways has technology affected the types of relationships pp make?Has this become a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rable bearing on the human relationship in a positive way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, really, so, thus, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29122807018 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92975942779 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6321777317 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.533333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266818692507 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888240066499 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062323990221 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170196951741 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036862038108 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.