Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
It is true that the communication methods between people have been changed because of technology advancement. It affects relationship in various ways, and in my opinion this trend will have both advantageous and disadvantageous development.
There is no doubt that technology has had an impact on relationship in business, social life and education. First of all, telephone and the Internet allow business people to have conference in different countries. Secondly, in the past people would make friends face to face, while now they can take advantage of social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter, to know new friends, who share common interests. This form of interacting just need computer or cellphone rather than face to face. In terms of education, technology innovation enables people to have a new form of relationship between students and teachers. Students, for instance, are able to take online video courses and contact with their teachers immediately and remotely.
On the one hand, technology progress can be positive development. Cooperation in different countries was very different in the past, as communication was limited to telegrams and written letters. By contrast, now emails and Skype have been used widely around the globe, which is as good as face to face meeting. On the other hand, this development will have negative effect. Young adults can be taken as an example, as most of them prefer to sit in front of computer to find friends rather than stick around with their peers in real world. This sedentary style will incur obesity and myopia based on the latest research. And also, such virtual relationship is poor substitute for a real one, as individuals cannot experience the real friendship via cyberspace.
To conclude, technology certainly reform the way that people communicate, however not all of them are positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 73
- In spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this case? What can be done about it? 84
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world, subject like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. Do you agree or disagree? Any other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 762, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce the real friendship via cyberspace. To conclude, technology certainly reform...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, no doubt, such as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29530201342 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94617113008 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2020330703 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24590980811 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756772267959 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628369221282 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159322870883 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433466518627 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.