Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?

Essay topics:

Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?

It is widely argued that the rate of producing rubbish is alarming number. While this is strong case of this view, solutions should be applied to resolve some of the serious issues which have arisen.
Nowadays, the considerate number of rubbish brings countless influence for people. There are two primary effects in term of health and environment. One reason is that community health would be depleted seriously. The waste remains in the atmosphere would bring diseases for numerous people, especially people who work involving in rubbish find it easy to infect respiratory diseases. According to the newest statistics in 2018, there are 4 millions the dead and approximately 40 millions children infect diseases involving in rubbish. Moreover, places concentrating on huge rubbish always attract to insects such as mosquito or mouse. For instance, in the remote regions where have a bad atmosphere, a large of people died due to diseases involving in insects yearly. Another reason is that environment would be exploded in the future if governments did not give some decision. Firstly, influence on water environment. As usual, inhabitant often has bad behavior because they throw away daily rubbish in river or lake. Rubbish would damage water resource and make it not clean. Thus, some beautiful beach in Vietnam was broken due to bad people awareness such as Sam Son beach or Ha Long beach. Secondly, various ingredients in waste such as CO2 would damage atmosphere environment. Hence, people often smell unpleasantly when they stand beside rubbish.
In present, governments should measure some solutions in order to reinforce situation. First of all, governments should encourage inhabitant reduce the frequency of using plastic bags. Based on people behavior, they often merely use plastic bags once and throw away it, thus the amount of plastic bags would dump into environment. Or governments could organize activities involving in protecting environment to transmit satisfactory messages for people. As far as I know, friendly environment – a national environment program with large-scale that attract to numerous people in the world. Moreover, governments also inhibit inhabitant throw rubbish inexact place. For instance, in Vietnam, people not keeping the law would be punished by huge financial. Thanks to strictly government law, situation environment in Vietnam decreased remarkably with 18% per year.
In conclusion, only addressing environment issues, countries would be better

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-10 anhoanguyenquin 78 view
2019-12-10 anhoanguyenquin 84 view
2019-12-10 anhoanguyenquin 78 view
2019-11-07 dhnhung 56 view
2019-07-10 Biamsaul 78 view
Essays by user tien.xinh.ne :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... solutions should be applied to resolve some of the serious issues which have arisen. Nowa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onment issues, countries would be better
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50649350649 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85316133443 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576623376623 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4706212204 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.12 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122347784445 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369994428402 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393136009183 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072214255056 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461855995876 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.