Nowadays we are producing more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can government do to reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In the contemporary era, awareness is growing related to excessive trash produced by people. The certain measures can be taken by authorities to decline the amout of litter. The reasons and ways to overcome this issue are mentioned in the subsequent paragraphs.
To commence with, the prevailing reason regarding mounting garbage is that rise in consumerism. To explain, nowadays companies use excessive packing to improve their sales of product and to gravitate customers by making products presentable. As a result that packing become waste because it is non reusable and ut leads to collection of garbage. Moreover, government and big companies encourage this consumption to increase the budget and to develop the economy of country. But buying new products means abandoning old ones and they will become garbage.
On the other hand, the prominenet solution to solve this issue is authorities and public should take war footing efforts. To elucidate, firstly government should make laws and rules such as packaging make by companies should bio degradable so that nature can not be effected. Apart from this, people should carry their own clothes bag and paper bags to buy items and abandon plastic bags. In addition, companies should change the way to gravitate customers for buying their products. For instance, customers should get discounts and offers for not asking plastic bags. Consequently, inclination of waste can be reduced with great success.
To sum up, everyone should get worried about future of human being and our planet. Otherwise earth will be flooded by rubbish. Inevitably, people should think twice before buying the products they do not need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... excessive trash produced by people. The certain measures can be taken by authori...
^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce with, the prevailing reason regarding mounting garbage is that rise in consume...
^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
... the economy of country. But buying new products means abandoning old ones and they will...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...t future of human being and our planet. Otherwise earth will be flooded by rubbish. Inevi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, moreover, regarding, so, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32830188679 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71388712722 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62641509434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8004286492 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0588235294 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117904454579 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348139849108 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331484202495 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696302634447 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248193389391 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.