Teenagers of this era are seen to have more social problems than before. A part of society believes that this is because parents prioritize their commitments over their children and hence, do not give them enough time. I entirely agree with this notion. As there is trend of both parents working children are often neglected.
To start with, in this modern age, both men and women are working equally to meet their needs. As a result of which children get ignored. They spend their morning time in schools where they learn academic knowledge, and the later part of day either alone at home or are taken care by caretakers. Since they have no emotional attachment with the child, they do not struggle to make them able to communicate effectively with the society. Therefore, such children lack communication skills. A survey demonstrated that children whose one parent stayed at home to rear them up were more efficient in socializing than others.
In addition to this, children of working parents when get caught in any problem panick more than others. As elders do comfort their offsprings in difficult time, their unavailability can lead to depression and psychological disorders in young ones. Such children are often more aggressive because when they do not get affection and time of their parents their behaviour becomes voilent. Hence, the personality of a child is effected badly. An article published in a magazine read that children who are not under constant supervision of their parents lack far behind in moral values.
In conclusion, parents are responsible for the upbringing of their children. Their giving much time and importance to work can have negative impact on children's personality and his socialising skills. Thus, one of them should stay at home to look after the offsprings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ime. I entirely agree with this notion. As there is trend of both parents working ...
^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re working equally to meet their needs. As a result of which children get ignored....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09427609428 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70623301443 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1467985286 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0555555556 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341980477009 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105058220411 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558434872442 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221180092656 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516570286098 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.