In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
people have different views about whether the government should spend more on the improvement of the current public transport system in some nations. While some argue that this can greatly promote the efficiency of our traffic network, I personally believe that the extension of a railway route can benefit our society in the long term.
There are various reasons why people think that the official council should allocate more resources to the old traffic system. They may assert that our city keeps developing continually which the latest route of buses in the past would be probably outdated in the future. More public budget putting on route-reorganization would improve the usage of some unpopular transportation, such as minibusses and tram. Secondly, it would give a positive effect on environmental protection that greenhouse gases and pollutants are generally emitted by vehicles with the old-style engine. For example, it is reported in Apply Daily that over 40% of pollutants in Hong Kong comes from the automobile. Subsidizing the whole industry to replace the newest environmental-friendly model can improve the poor quality.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that it is worth for government to have an investment in a larger railway system. In the first place, railway act as the most important transportation to create a connection with residential areas, commercial zones, and industrial region, and this fully is beneficial for people living in that state. Another reason is that the government should have an obligation to increase living qualities and infrastructure projects can provide various job opportunities to the markets which lower down the unemployment rate. In the long term, high accessibility can attract tourists around the world to visit different destination and it provides more tax revenue from the tourism industry.
In conclusion, although it is might seem sensible for having an adjustment on a permanent system, I personally prefer the expansion of the transit railway.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads 78
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 67
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to get news However others believe that they can get news better through another media Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- 123 11
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
people have different views about whether the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13059013737 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0033064873 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150875242672 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522224137999 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434680036885 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896626416041 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368293007617 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.