In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Recently, the question of how to spend public money has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that improving existing public transport systems should take precedence over building a new, faster railway line for bullet trains, while others argue otherwise. And I wholeheartedly agree with the former stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that the government should make use of public funds in order to construct new bullet train lines do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that the advent of these lines could facilitate the nationwide transport of goods as well as passengers. To be more specific, not only can people with relatives in other parts of the country meet each other with greater ease, but parcels are able to be delivered quickly. Furthermore, the introduction of new railway lines leads to a boom in domestic tourism, which invigorates economic growth and makes it possible for citizens to have an improved standard of living.
My opinion, however, is that more emphasis should be put on ameliorating current public transport than establishing new railway lines for bullet trains. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that existing transport plays an important role in people's daily life. This is because the majority of citizens often use existing public transport systems to commute to and from work. In other words, an increase in the quality of these systems would exert a more significant impact on their well-being. Furthermore, allocating public funding to new railway lines place a heavy burden on locals considering that an astronomical sum of tax money is required to erect these lines. To exemplify, research conducted by the government of China has demonstrated that the amount of tax money dedicated to setting up new bullet train lines is predicted approximately three times higher than upgrading current transport systems. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that updating current public transport should be a priority for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- Q5 In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss b 78
- Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q4 Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both views and give your opini 92
- Q Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely Others think this is a waste of financial resources Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Q3 Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that updating...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20533333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75668077385 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3075661414 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.823529412 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354356836767 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967410761915 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697389201132 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209951835054 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664420180614 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.