In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large some of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The early years of this contemporary century have witnessed the visibility of the bullet train. This have created major debates in our modern societies. While some commenters believe it is a future necessity to expand more railways for these top-speed vehicles, the others persuade for allocating the transportation budget for the conventional means.
On one hand, the specialists who press for old methods believe that, these ultra-modern means of transportation probably will consume significant portion of the taxes without a direct impact on regular tax payers. For instance, the operational and maintenance costs for these trains are ultimately expensive which will reflect on tickets prices aggressively which will narrow the categories of the customers. Thus, the cost effectiveness of this project is not certain. In contrast, allocating monetary resources for maintaining the efficiency of the conventional means of transport will serve larger portion of the community and its direct impacts on average citizens are obvious.
On the other hand, some economists persuade for these ultra-fast trains as from their point of view is an investment in the future. They believe that the merits of these bullet trains will benefit the whole community either directly and indirectly. The direct effect is represented in offering rapid and safer alternative of transportation for passengers and cargos especially in-between countries as in Europe. Indirectly, these vehicles shall attract the speed lovers and tourists who will use these mean for amusement, this will create new resources for the national treasuries.
In the same vein, some studies showed that, the tickets prices will not represent a real obstacle as the increase will be only 15%. This because, the financial income of the cargoes’ vehicles as well as the licensures of advertisements and promotion will be sufficient enough to not double or triple the tickets for regular riders.
In conclusion, despite spending money on conventional public transportation seems vitally as it is a current need, investing in these modern railways shall carry a fruitful impact to whole society in the foreseen future. In my opinion, the drawbacks of this project will fade out over time and the positive effects will remain.
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economics in a very positive way, its negative side should not beforgotten. Discuss. 84
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving public transport,Discuss both of these v 84
- Dieting can change a person’s life for the better or ruin one’s health completely. What is your opinion? 84
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economics in a very positive way, its negative side should not beforgotten. Discuss. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49152542373 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97221323558 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556497175141 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1085329069 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166808190336 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578795512918 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488844528249 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990159825669 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317940293329 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.